Asbestos – a deadly trigger for pleural mesothelioma cancer

By Luciano Marinelli

Asbestos is a natural mineral consisting of soft, flexible fibres which are resistant to heat, electricity and corrosion. Because of this, asbestos is an effective insulator and can be used to strengthen materials such as cement, clothing and paper. However, it has been shown that, when inhaled or ingested, it can cause a rare but aggressive cancer called mesothelioma (Asbestos, n.d.). Mesothelioma cancer attacks mesothelioma tissue and mostly affects the lining of the lungs and chest cavity, called the pleura. Pleural mesothelioma cancer is in fact the most common form, accounting for at least 75% of all mesothelioma cases (Asbestos, n.d.). Because there is still no cure, it is vital to be aware of its causes hence know how to prevent it. This review will outline the mechanisms by which asbestos causes this aggressive and still incurable cancer.

There are three main types of asbestos fibres that are used commercially – crocidolite, amosite and chrysotile. All three have been shown to be major causes of mesothelioma cancer, but considering chrysolite represents approximately 95% of the total production of all asbestos forms, this can be considered the number one trigger (Smith A.H. et al., 1996). Many studies have investigated the mechanisms behind this. In summary, asbestos fibres can migrate to the mesothelioma cells forming the pleural lining, where they become trapped. Here, they cause chronic inflammation and genetic damage, turning these cells cancerous. These will then grow uncontrollably forming a mass of plaque in the pleura, and this, together with the resulting accumulation of pleural fluid in the chest cavity, leads to breathing difficulties and other symptoms characteristic of this form of cancer (Asbestos, n.d.).  

There are many factors that affect the potency of asbestos fibres, such as dimensions, durability, chemical composition and, most importantly, length. The length of the inhaled or ingested fibres is the major factor, and it has been shown that long asbestos fibres (LAFs) have a greater effect than short asbestos fibres (SAFs). LAFs are less easily phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages to be removed from the airways compared to SAFs, hence will be retained in the lungs for a longer time and, as a result, have a longer lasting and stronger effect (Boulanger G. et al., 2014). The continuously failed phagocytosis of LAFs by alveolar macrophages will trigger these cells to release reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn will lead to DNA damage and chronic inflammation (Gaudino G. et al., 2020). 

Many studies have also proposed another mechanism that results in ROS production, in which the iron present on or around the asbestos fibres can trigger this carcinogenic process (Benedetti S. et al., 2015). Asbestos provides a surface onto which various proteins from the cytoplasm adsorb, leading to the cells shrinking onto the fibre forming asbestos bodies (Botham S.K. et al., 1968). The iron in the asbestos bodies will catalyze the formation of ROS by promoting the formation of the highly reactive OH free radical from H2O2 (Fenton reaction), which can also be triggered by the asbestos-activated macrophages in the alveoli (Hardy J.A. et al., 1995). OH and other ROS modify DNA, particularly at telomeres, as well as DNA repair proteins, resulting in DNA strand breaks and base modifications. 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8OhdG) is a major product of this oxidative damage (Benedetti A. et al., 2015), and causes G🡪T and A🡪C base substitutions, which have been shown to be sites of oncogene expression, leading to cancer proliferation (Moriya M., 1993).  

Moreover, exposure to asbestos causes necrosis of healthy mesothelioma cells because of the increased production of TNF-α (Yang H. et al., 2006) and HMGB1 (Gaudino G. et al., 2020). HMGB1 is a damage-associated protein (DAMP) and can be secreted into the extracellular space where it will bind to RAGE receptors on inflammatory cells such as macrophages (Pellegrini L. et al., 2017). Binding of HMGB1 to RAGE receptors will promote chronic inflammation by increasing the expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which in turn induces the expression of various cytokines, particularly interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (Gaudino G. et al., 2020). This inflammatory environment triggers the transformation of the remaining mesothelioma cells into carcinogenic. The subsequent activation of the NF-κB-dependent pathway promotes survival and proliferation of the malignant mesothelioma cells, allowing the cancer to spread (Nishikawa S. et al., 2014). 

Carcinogenesis of the mesothelioma cells is acquired through gene mutations affecting DNA repair mechanisms (Gaudino G. et al., 2020). Mutations in the BRCA1 associated protein 1 (BAP1) gene are the most common, having been shown to be present in around 20% of mesothelioma cancer specimens (Rusch A. et al., 2015). This mutation, located at chromosome 3p21, has been shown to affect the germline and be transmitted via Mendelian autosomal dominant inheritance. This suggests mesothelioma is linked to the interaction between genes and environment (GxE interaction), rather than asbestos alone (Yoshikawa Y. et al., 2020). Support of this discovery comes from experiments performed with BAP1+/- heterozygous mice exposed to very low doses of asbestos fibres. These developed mesothelioma at a similar rate to WT BAP1 mice exposed at ten-times higher doses (Napolitano A. et al., 2016). BAP1 is mainly localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, where it deubiquitylates and stabilises the IP3R3 receptor, responsible for modulating Ca2+ release from the ER to the cytosol, from where it will move into mitochondria and cause apoptosis. Therefore, lower levels of BAP1 are associated with reduced apoptosis of malignant mesothelioma cells, hence allowing the cancer to proliferate and cause further damage (Affar E.B. et al., 2018).    

Overall, asbestos is a big cause of concern for the development of malignant mesothelioma cancer. In light of the large amount of research confirming its toxicity, the use of asbestos has been banned in more than 52 countries (Baur X. et al., 2015). However, up to 1% of asbestos is still legal to use in the United States (Maacenter, n.d.), and research is showing an increasing involvement of GxE interaction, suggesting asbestos isn’t the only cause of mesothelioma. Therefore, more research has to be done to get a clearer picture on its pathogenesis, so that better treatments, as well as more effective policies regarding asbestos use, can be developed. 

References:

Affar, E., & Carbone, M. (2018). BAP1 regulates different mechanisms of cell death. Cell Death & Disease, [online] Volume 9(12), p. 1151. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6242853/ 

Asbestos. What is pleural mesothelioma? Full overview & what to expect. [online] Available at: https://www.asbestos.com/mesothelioma/pleural/ 

Baur, X., Soskolne, C. L., Lemen, R. A., Schneider, J., Woitowitz, H., & Budnik, L. T. (2015). How conflicted authors undermine the World Health Organization (WHO) campaign to stop all use of asbestos: Spotlight on studies showing that chrysotile is carcinogenic and facilitates other non-cancer asbestos-related diseases. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, [online] Volume 21(2), pp. 176-179. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000105 

Benedetti, S., Nuvoli, B., Catalani, S., & Galati, R. (2015). Reactive oxygen species a double-edged sword for mesothelioma. Oncotarget, [online] Volume 6(19), pp. 16848-16865. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4627278/ 

Botham, S. K., & Holt, P. F. (1968). The mechanism of formation of asbestos bodies. The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, [online] Volume 96(2), pp. 443-453. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/path.1700960223 

Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J., Billon-Galland, M., Dion, C., Dumortier, P. et al. (2014). Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity. Environmental Health, [online] Volume 13, p. 59. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112850/ 

Gaudino, G., Xue, J., & Yang, H. (2020). How asbestos and other fibers cause mesothelioma. Translational Lung Cancer Research, [online] Volume 9, pp. 39-46. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082251/ 

Hardy, J. A., & Aust, A. E. (1995). Iron in Asbestos Chemistry and Carcinogenicity. Chemical Reviews, [online] Volume 95(1), pp. 97-118. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/cr00033a005?casa_token=S2TkVRfYYRsAAAAA:JOSJXTv6JJHsYpWXXlkzyu9aZ8FxOJewgWfS41Y7CaFWwf8Oquqw7YAeUp9-DxhiJrr6jbKf00xRCKBD& 

King D. What is asbestos? How does it cause asbestos? [online] Asbestos. Available at: https://www.asbestos.com/asbestos/ 

Moriya, M. (1993). Single-stranded shuttle phagemid for mutagenesis studies in mammalian cells: 8-oxoguanine in DNA induces targeted G.C–T.A transversions in simian kidney cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, [online] Volume 90(3), pp. 1122-1126. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC45823/ 

Napolitano, A., Pellegrini, L., Dey, A., Larson, D., Tanji, M., Flores, E. G. et al. (2015). Minimal asbestos exposure in germline BAP1 heterozygous mice is associated with deregulated inflammatory response and increased risk of mesothelioma. Oncogene, [online] Volume 35(15), pp. 1996-2002. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5018040/ 

Nelson T. What products still contain asbestos? [online] Mesothelioma + Asbestos Awareness Center. Available at: https://www.maacenter.org/asbestos/products/ 

Nishikawa, S., Tanaka, A., Matsuda, A., Oida, K., Jang, H., Jung, K., . . . Matsuda, H. (2014). A molecular targeting against nuclear factor‐ κ B, as a chemotherapeutic approach for human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Medicine, [online] Volume 3(2), pp. 416-425. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987091/ 

Pellegrini, L., Xue, J., Larson, D., Pastorino, S., Jube, S., Forest, K. H. et al. (2017). HMGB1 targeting by ethyl pyruvate suppresses malignant phenotype of human mesothelioma. Oncotarget, [online] Volume 8(14), pp. 22649-22661. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5410252/ 

Rusch, A., Ziltener, G., Nackaerts, K., Weder, W., Stahel, R. A., & Felley-Bosco, E. (2015). Prevalence of BRCA-1 associated protein 1 germline mutation in sporadic malignant pleural mesothelioma cases. Lung Cancer, [online] Volume 87(1), pp. 77-79. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25468148/ 

Smith, A. H., & Wright, C. C. (1996). Chrysotile asbestos is the main cause of pleural mesothelioma. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, [online] Volume 30(3), pp. 252-266. Available at: doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199609)30:33.0.co;2-0 

Yang, H., Bocchetta, M., Kroczynska, B., Elmishad, A. G., Chen, Y., Liu, Z. et al. (2006). TNF-α inhibits asbestos-induced cytotoxicity via a NF-κB-dependent pathway, a possible mechanism for asbestos-induced oncogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, [online] Volume 103(27), pp. 10397-10402. Available from: https://www.pnas.org/content/103/27/10397 

Yoshikawa, Y., Emi, M., Nakano, T., & Gaudino, G. (2020). Mesothelioma developing in carriers of inherited genetic mutations. Translational Lung Cancer Research, [online] Volume 9(S1), pp. 67-76. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7082255/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s